AI concentration and wind field slurper and plotter

ai
(ver. 4/12/06 )

Reads CAMx concentration and wind-field files for both
coarse and fine grids, and fiddles around with them

4/12/06 12:30:28

Hours are limited to 8784; model grid to 97 columns by 90 rows; layers to 1; multinested cells to 330000.

Cell of highest emission for each species and each category
Reasonableness-checking of the chemical emission rates
National monitoring data
Ohio monitors and design values
Attainment (or not) Demonstration
Monitor-to-Model Relative Reduction Factors
Monitor location needs analysis
Back-trajectory analysis
Human exposure modeling
List of data sources

Summary of concentration data here

Day-by-day fine grid specifications:

meshing dummy

day no. (ibeg,jbeg) (iend,jend) factor no. (row,cols,layers) iparnt ilevel

Day-by-day fine grid specifications:

meshing dummy

day no. (ibeg,jbeg) (iend,jend) factor no. (row,cols,layers) iparnt ilevel

Reading of a second set of concentration files completed, from 2009_23.conf (but the values listed below are from the first set, unless otherwise indicated)

572 ozone monitors exist nationwide.

Header lines (3) from O3_design_values_5yr :
three header lines expected
don't know
just why

Results of the recalculation of design values here.

Here are the Ohio monitors present in the long list but absent from the short one:

0 found.

Attainment (or not) Demonstration

demonstration interval: 4/1/02 hr 1 Mon to 9/30/02 hr 24 Mon

Design values, relative reduction factors, and prospective design values for a bunch of monitors.

Old case: K23.conf
New case: 2009_23.conf

Only days with baseline modeled 8-hr concentration greater than 0.0700
participate in the calculation of rrf.

					old	new	cell
station	state	county	rrf	days	design val.	design val.	size
390030002	Ohio	Allen	0.88003	41	88.0	77.44
390071001	Ohio	Ashtabula	0.88125	72	95.6	84.25
390170004	Ohio	Butler	0.89568	62	89.6	80.25
390171004	Ohio	Butler	0.89568	62	87.6	78.46
390250022	Ohio	Clermont	0.88901	70	89.3	79.39
390610006	Ohio	Hamilton	0.91932	63	90.3	83.01
390610010	Ohio	Hamilton	0.91932	63	85.6	78.69
390610040	Ohio	Hamilton	0.91932	63	86.0	79.06
391650006	Ohio	Warren	0.88426	71	90.6	80.11
390230001	Ohio	Clark	0.88160	56	88.6	78.11
390230003	Ohio	Clark	0.88963	66	85.3	75.89
390570006	Ohio	Greene	0.88963	66	87.6	77.93
391090005	Ohio	Miami	0.88160	56	87.0	76.70
391130019	Ohio	Montgomery	0.88963	66	86.5#	76.95
391351001	Ohio	Preble	0.87796	54	80.0	70.24
390271002	Ohio	Clinton	0.86104	66	94.3	81.20
390350034	Ohio	Cuyahoga	0.90772	61	78.3	71.07
390350064	Ohio	Cuyahoga	0.89757	74	81.6	73.24
390355002	Ohio	Cuyahoga	0.90772	61	88.0	79.88
390550004	Ohio	Geauga	0.87015	59	99.0	86.14
390850003	Ohio	Lake	0.90338	72	92.6	83.65
390853002	Ohio	Lake	0.90338	72	83.0	74.98
391331001	Ohio	Portage	0.86433	60	91.0	78.65
391030003	Ohio	Medina	0.85713	56	87.0	74.57
391530020	Ohio	Summit	0.87741	56	93.3	81.86
390410002	Ohio	Delaware	0.87176	50	89.0	77.59
390490028	Ohio	Franklin	0.88294	54	86.0#	75.93
390490029	Ohio	Franklin	0.87334	62	93.0#	81.22
390490037	Ohio	Franklin	0.88294	54	86.5#	76.37
390490081	Ohio	Franklin	0.88294	54	84.0	74.17
390830002	Ohio	Knox	0.86252	51	87.0	75.04
390890005	Ohio	Licking	0.85104	61	88.0	74.89
390970007	Ohio	Madison	0.87021	63	88.6	77.10
390810016	Ohio	Jefferson	0.83262	73	86.0#	71.61
390870006	Ohio	Lawrence	0.84386	85	82.0	69.20
390870011	Ohio	Lawrence	0.84386	85	76.6	64.64
390930017	Ohio	Lorain	0.89757	74	87.0	78.09
390950024	Ohio	Lucas	0.90939	39	83.3	75.75
390950027	Ohio	Lucas	0.88210	39	82.0	72.33
390950034	Ohio	Lucas	0.94231	47	90.0	84.81
390950081	Ohio	Lucas	0.90939	39	88.6	80.57
391730003	Ohio	Wood	0.88210	39	87.6	77.27
390990013	Ohio	Mahoning	0.85308	62	87.0	74.22
391550011	Ohio	Trumbull	0.85951	63	92.5#	79.50
391550009	Ohio	Trumbull	0.85951	63	88.0	75.64
391510016	Ohio	Stark	0.85381	60	88.0	75.14
391510021	Ohio	Stark	0.85802	54	86.3	74.05
391511009	Ohio	Stark	0.85381	60	88.3	75.39
391514005	Ohio	Stark	0.86433	60	88.3	76.32
391670004	Ohio	Washington	0.80748	81	85.6	69.12
170310042	Illinois	Cook	0.98890	26	88*	87.02
170317002	Illinois	Cook	1.18336	3	86*	101.77
170971007	Illinois	Lake	0.92323	32	87*	80.32
260990009	Michigan	Macomb	0.93970	30	97*	91.15
260991003	Michigan	Macomb	0.93970	30	95*	89.27
261630019	Michigan	Wayne	0.95651	35	91*	87.04
420030010	Pennsylvania	Allegheny	0.89384	63	93*	83.13
420070002	Pennsylvania	Beaver	0.86207	69	94*	81.03
420490003	Pennsylvania	Erie	0.89557	67	92*	82.39

All design values are based on five years of data,
except those marked with "*" which are based on three, or"#" which are based on four.

5299 coarse grid rrf's calculated; 3431 cells are uncalculable.
The highest rrf is 1.1834 at ( 63, 95); the lowest is 0.7769 at ( 46, 97)

Maximum red = 1.183
Deepest blue = 0.777

Repeat of calculations with a new threshold for calculation of rrf

Attainment (or not) Demonstration

demonstration interval: 4/1/02 hr 1 Mon to 9/30/02 hr 24 Mon

Design values, relative reduction factors, and prospective design values for a bunch of monitors.

Old case: K23.conf
New case: 2009_23.conf

Only days with baseline modeled 8-hr concentration greater than 0.0850
participate in the calculation of rrf.

					old	new	cell
station	state	county	rrf	days	design val.	design val.	size
390030002	Ohio	Allen	0.86920	3	88.0	76.49
390071001	Ohio	Ashtabula	0.86554	39	95.6	82.75
390170004	Ohio	Butler	0.88604	22	89.6	79.39
390171004	Ohio	Butler	0.88604	22	87.6	77.62
390250022	Ohio	Clermont	0.87812	37	89.3	78.42
390610006	Ohio	Hamilton	0.90568	30	90.3	81.78
390610010	Ohio	Hamilton	0.90568	30	85.6	77.53
390610040	Ohio	Hamilton	0.90568	30	86.0	77.89
391650006	Ohio	Warren	0.87955	31	90.6	79.69
390230001	Ohio	Clark	0.87551	11	88.6	77.57
390230003	Ohio	Clark	0.88296	20	85.3	75.32
390570006	Ohio	Greene	0.88296	20	87.6	77.35
391090005	Ohio	Miami	0.87551	11	87.0	76.17
391130019	Ohio	Montgomery	0.88296	20	86.5#	76.38
391351001	Ohio	Preble	0.87571	6	80.0	70.06
390271002	Ohio	Clinton	0.85728	15	94.3	80.84
390350034	Ohio	Cuyahoga	0.88926	27	78.3	69.63
390350064	Ohio	Cuyahoga	0.88093	31	81.6	71.88
390355002	Ohio	Cuyahoga	0.88926	27	88.0	78.26
390550004	Ohio	Geauga	0.85925	27	99.0	85.07
390850003	Ohio	Lake	0.88972	46	92.6	82.39
390853002	Ohio	Lake	0.88972	46	83.0	73.85
391331001	Ohio	Portage	0.85090	22	91.0	77.43
391030003	Ohio	Medina	0.83837	14	87.0	72.94
391530020	Ohio	Summit	0.86107	18	93.3	80.34
390410002	Ohio	Delaware	0.85308	8	89.0	75.92
390490028	Ohio	Franklin	0.87126	13	86.0#	74.93
390490029	Ohio	Franklin	0.85847	12	93.0#	79.84
390490037	Ohio	Franklin	0.87126	13	86.5#	75.36
390490081	Ohio	Franklin	0.87126	13	84.0	73.19
390830002	Ohio	Knox	0.85473	12	87.0	74.36
390890005	Ohio	Licking	0.85722	14	88.0	75.44
390970007	Ohio	Madison	0.86882	12	88.6	76.98
390810016	Ohio	Jefferson	0.81825	33	86.0#	70.37
390870006	Ohio	Lawrence	0.83564	26	82.0	68.52
390870011	Ohio	Lawrence	0.83564	26	76.6	64.01
390930017	Ohio	Lorain	0.88093	31	87.0	76.64
390950024	Ohio	Lucas	0.89834	6	83.3	74.83
390950027	Ohio	Lucas	0.87316	5	82.0	71.60
390950034	Ohio	Lucas	0.93188	21	90.0	83.87
390950081	Ohio	Lucas	0.89834	6	88.6	79.59
391730003	Ohio	Wood	0.87316	5	87.6	76.49
390990013	Ohio	Mahoning	0.84370	23	87.0	73.40
391550011	Ohio	Trumbull	0.84598	19	92.5#	78.25
391550009	Ohio	Trumbull	0.84598	19	88.0	74.45
391510016	Ohio	Stark	0.84824	15	88.0	74.65
391510021	Ohio	Stark	0.84645	10	86.3	73.05
391511009	Ohio	Stark	0.84824	15	88.3	74.90
391514005	Ohio	Stark	0.85090	22	88.3	75.13
391670004	Ohio	Washington	0.79154	33	85.6	67.76
170310042	Illinois	Cook	0.99141	7	88*	87.24
170317002	Illinois	Cook	---	0	86*	---
170971007	Illinois	Lake	0.90993	12	87*	79.16
260990009	Michigan	Macomb	0.93328	10	97*	90.53
260991003	Michigan	Macomb	0.93328	10	95*	88.66
261630019	Michigan	Wayne	0.94873	9	91*	86.33
420030010	Pennsylvania	Allegheny	0.87488	26	93*	81.36
420070002	Pennsylvania	Beaver	0.84226	31	94*	79.17
420490003	Pennsylvania	Erie	0.87621	35	92*	80.61

All design values are based on five years of data,
except those marked with "*" which are based on three, or"#" which are based on four.

2524 coarse grid rrf's calculated; 6206 cells are uncalculable.
The highest rrf is 0.9954 at ( 66, 94); the lowest is 0.7597 at ( 57,116)

Maximum red = 0.995
Deepest blue = 0.760

Monitor-to-Model Relative Reduction Factors

demonstration interval: 4/ 1/02 hr 1 Mon to 9/30/02 hr 24 Mon

RRFs greater than one indicate model overprediction; less than one, underprediction.

Base case: monitored data
Modeled case: K23.conf

Only days with baseline monitored 8-hr concentration greater than 70.00 ppb
participate in the calculation of rrf.

					matched	mean err.	RMS err.	monitor					model
station	state	county	rrf	days	points	(mod.-mon.)		1	2	3	4	avg.	1	2	3	4	avg.	ratio
170317002	Illinois	Cook	0.633	20	4143	-8.96	18.41	105.0	95.6	92.1	91.5	96.1	76.1	71.7	70.7	66.9	71.4	0.743
170971007	Illinois	Lake	0.926	23	4306	-0.04	14.73	116.5	113.0	112.1	100.5	110.5	104.0	99.2	97.2	95.3	98.9	0.895
260990009	Michigan	Macomb	0.917	32	4264	-2.73	14.66	102.9	97.6	96.0	95.9	98.1	103.2	101.6	94.8	92.0	97.9	0.998
260991003	Michigan	Macomb	0.952	27	4085	-1.09	13.96	100.9	99.0	93.0	92.8	96.4	103.2	101.6	94.8	92.0	97.9	1.015
261630019	Michigan	Wayne	1.016	21	3940	2.04	14.69	90.2	85.5	84.8	83.5	86.0	96.2	95.7	94.1	90.5	94.1	1.095
390030002	Ohio	Allen	0.883	36	4138	3.17	13.56	105.0	102.4	99.2	98.4	101.2	87.8	85.8	85.6	82.9	85.5	0.845
390071001	Ohio	Ashtabula	1.009	43	4152	11.49	19.47	108.0	107.2	104.9	103.9	106.0	114.3	112.9	107.1	106.7	110.3	1.040
390170004	Ohio	Butler	0.953	40	4117	9.19	18.00	113.6	105.1	102.9	100.1	105.4	100.7	99.8	98.6	97.9	99.2	0.941
390171004	Ohio	Butler	0.981	48	4303	7.26	16.54	108.1	105.5	99.0	98.4	102.8	100.7	99.8	98.6	97.9	99.2	0.966
390230001	Ohio	Clark	0.887	58	4344	4.09	15.92	118.4	100.5	99.9	99.6	104.6	95.8	93.1	92.6	92.2	93.4	0.893
390230003	Ohio	Clark	0.983	43	4096	7.46	16.97	107.4	96.6	95.4	94.9	98.6	98.7	98.5	95.3	95.2	96.9	0.984
390271002	Ohio	Clinton	0.947	52	4027	4.41	13.53	112.2	103.6	101.0	99.8	104.2	97.5	95.0	94.8	94.0	95.3	0.915
390350034	Ohio	Cuyahoga	1.112	24	4195	9.35	18.42	99.5	95.1	91.6	90.2	94.1	117.0	115.5	107.4	106.3	111.5	1.185
390350064	Ohio	Cuyahoga	1.135	28	3915	15.50	21.80	107.0	95.5	92.1	90.9	96.4	110.2	109.9	109.8	108.0	109.5	1.136
390355002	Ohio	Cuyahoga	1.029	31	4298	0.96	14.65	107.5	105.4	102.4	98.9	103.5	117.0	115.5	107.4	106.3	111.5	1.077
390410002	Ohio	Delaware	0.915	47	4155	4.43	14.14	105.5	98.2	97.8	97.6	99.8	95.5	92.2	90.4	90.3	92.1	0.923
390490028	Ohio	Franklin	0.924	48	4193	5.17	15.13	103.6	102.4	98.6	96.9	100.4	97.7	94.9	91.6	91.4	93.9	0.935
390490029	Ohio	Franklin	0.917	54	4159	-0.83	13.50	118.4	105.5	104.5	103.9	108.1	93.4	92.7	91.7	90.8	92.2	0.853
390490081	Ohio	Franklin	0.951	32	4164	4.98	15.40	102.0	97.2	97.1	95.9	98.1	97.7	94.9	91.6	91.4	93.9	0.957
390550004	Ohio	Geauga	0.931	51	4358	-2.14	14.12	122.4	117.0	115.9	115.2	117.6	107.1	104.1	103.6	99.0	103.5	0.880
390570006	Ohio	Greene	1.002	41	4358	2.59	14.38	101.1	100.8	98.4	96.1	99.1	98.7	98.5	95.3	95.2	96.9	0.978
390610006	Ohio	Hamilton	1.030	46	4335	2.97	14.93	117.0	107.1	100.6	98.6	105.8	107.5	106.3	105.2	103.4	105.6	0.998
390610010	Ohio	Hamilton	1.032	31	4294	11.53	20.04	101.2	100.2	100.0	96.1	99.4	107.5	106.3	105.2	103.4	105.6	1.062
390610040	Ohio	Hamilton	1.044	40	4367	4.61	16.46	110.0	106.8	97.5	95.6	102.5	107.5	106.3	105.2	103.4	105.6	1.030
390810016	Ohio	Jefferson	1.046	39	4132	13.73	21.07	99.9	94.9	93.6	93.1	95.4	102.2	101.5	99.2	98.6	100.4	1.052
390830002	Ohio	Knox	0.943	42	4117	4.35	11.90	99.8	98.4	95.4	95.1	97.2	93.2	90.2	89.6	88.6	90.4	0.930
390850003	Ohio	Lake	1.044	42	4331	9.51	18.76	113.1	112.9	107.1	104.6	109.4	121.7	116.9	113.3	111.1	115.8	1.058
390853002	Ohio	Lake	1.190	27	4347	11.50	19.35	100.1	95.2	89.8	88.5	93.4	121.7	116.9	113.3	111.1	115.8	1.239
390870006	Ohio	Lawrence	1.019	43	4147	16.74	23.63	105.4	94.5	93.4	92.5	96.4	98.4	97.9	97.9	96.9	97.8	1.014
390870011	Ohio	Lawrence	1.106	28	3507	22.23	27.32	90.8	87.0	85.5	83.0	86.6	98.4	97.9	97.9	96.9	97.8	1.130
390890005	Ohio	Licking	0.947	42	4144	11.46	18.90	109.8	98.5	98.5	96.6	100.8	92.2	89.2	89.1	89.0	89.9	0.891
390930017	Ohio	Lorain	1.081	36	4172	12.84	19.30	115.5	99.5	99.1	97.2	102.8	110.2	109.9	109.8	108.0	109.5	1.065
390950024	Ohio	Lucas	0.957	21	4327	7.88	17.56	95.9	94.5	93.4	92.0	93.9	92.7	90.5	89.2	89.0	90.3	0.962
390950027	Ohio	Lucas	0.960	26	4151	8.65	16.26	93.9	90.0	88.4	86.1	89.6	90.8	87.0	86.0	85.5	87.3	0.975
390950034	Ohio	Lucas	1.037	29	4285	4.98	15.86	101.2	98.6	98.1	96.8	98.7	124.1	118.2	110.8	110.2	115.8	1.174
390950081	Ohio	Lucas	0.915	27	4147	2.60	15.85	103.6	99.5	94.9	94.1	98.0	92.7	90.5	89.2	89.0	90.3	0.922
390970007	Ohio	Madison	0.954	52	4195	3.85	12.38	102.8	98.8	98.0	97.2	99.2	96.1	92.5	91.4	89.8	92.5	0.932
390990013	Ohio	Mahoning	1.034	39	4127	12.75	20.02	103.9	99.4	98.1	96.9	99.6	102.3	97.4	95.9	95.7	97.8	0.983
391030003	Ohio	Medina	0.993	39	4164	10.14	17.86	97.1	95.8	92.6	91.4	94.2	103.2	102.7	98.3	93.9	99.5	1.056
391090005	Ohio	Miami	0.916	46	4272	1.03	13.06	102.8	99.5	99.4	96.9	99.6	95.8	93.1	92.6	92.2	93.4	0.938
391130019	Ohio	Montgomery	0.988	36	4213	6.75	16.97	109.6	97.5	96.9	95.0	99.8	98.7	98.5	95.3	95.2	96.9	0.972
391331001	Ohio	Portage	0.961	32	3727	8.49	17.09	100.8	98.4	97.0	96.5	98.2	100.7	98.9	95.2	94.4	97.3	0.991
391351001	Ohio	Preble	0.925	31	4311	9.57	19.21	97.1	95.6	95.6	95.2	95.9	92.7	90.4	89.6	88.5	90.3	0.942
391510016	Ohio	Stark	0.973	42	4298	7.09	14.97	97.9	97.2	95.4	94.9	96.3	96.6	92.6	92.5	91.7	93.4	0.969
391511009	Ohio	Stark	0.975	40	4234	9.72	16.85	98.2	96.1	95.9	94.5	96.2	96.6	92.6	92.5	91.7	93.4	0.971
391514005	Ohio	Stark	0.973	44	4056	7.69	16.05	103.9	98.8	98.2	98.0	99.7	100.7	98.9	95.2	94.4	97.3	0.976
391530020	Ohio	Summit	0.941	42	3908	6.78	16.26	112.0	107.2	105.8	103.0	107.0	110.6	98.2	97.0	96.6	100.6	0.940
391550009	Ohio	Trumbull	1.031	36	4182	10.60	17.92	101.5	100.5	96.5	94.5	98.2	103.0	102.6	98.8	96.3	100.2	1.020
391650006	Ohio	Warren	1.005	45	4357	8.86	18.11	111.5	103.2	101.8	98.4	103.7	101.3	99.5	99.0	97.3	99.3	0.957
391670004	Ohio	Washington	1.040	44	4167	13.52	21.25	106.0	98.9	97.2	95.9	99.5	103.2	99.7	98.3	95.4	99.1	0.996
391730003	Ohio	Wood	0.895	34	4136	7.36	15.97	108.8	103.2	98.5	94.9	101.3	90.8	87.0	86.0	85.5	87.3	0.862
420030010	Pennsylvania	Allegheny	0.976	44	4158	7.40	17.41	114.4	108.1	105.0	100.5	107.0	104.1	103.7	102.5	102.1	103.1	0.964
420070002	Pennsylvania	Beaver	0.975	42	4343	0.98	16.09	107.8	105.6	105.2	103.6	105.6	109.4	106.8	104.2	101.6	105.5	0.999
420490003	Pennsylvania	Erie	1.052	30	4212	13.67	21.15	103.2	102.6	101.6	98.8	101.6	104.5	104.0	103.8	103.3	103.9	1.023
170310042	Illinois	Cook	0.875	29	3988	-12.63	23.96	116.2	113.5	109.1	103.2	110.5	94.0	92.0	91.4	91.0	92.1	0.833
390250022	Ohio	Clermont	-1.000	0	0	NaN	NaN	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	105.8	103.5	103.0	99.9	103.1	******
390490037	Ohio	Franklin	-1.000	0	0	NaN	NaN	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	97.7	94.9	91.6	91.4	93.9	******
391550011	Ohio	Trumbull	-1.000	0	0	NaN	NaN	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	103.0	102.6	98.8	96.3	100.2	******
391510021	Ohio	Stark	-1.000	0	0	NaN	NaN	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	-1.0	91.7	91.7	91.4	88.5	90.8	******

For 572 monitors, rrf's range from 0.633 at 170317002 to 1.324 at 361030004

Analysis performed 4/12/06 12:30:28

Culpability-related analysis of monitors of particular interest

390850003 4/16/02 hr 7 Tue 5/28/02 hr 7 Tue 5/29/02 hr 7 Wed 5/30/02 hr 7 Thu 6/ 4/02 hr 8 Tue 6/ 5/02 hr 1 Wed 6/ 8/02 hr 7 Sat 6/ 9/02 hr 6 Sun 6/10/02 hr 7 Mon 6/11/02 hr 6 Tue 6/12/02 hr 1 Wed 6/20/02 hr 7 Thu 6/21/02 hr 24 Fri 6/22/02 hr 6 Sat 6/23/02 hr 7 Sun 6/24/02 hr 2 Mon 6/25/02 hr 6 Tue 6/30/02 hr 24 Sun 7/ 1/02 hr 1 Mon 7/ 2/02 hr 7 Tue 7/ 4/02 hr 24 Thu 7/ 8/02 hr 20 Mon 7/14/02 hr 20 Sun 7/15/02 hr 20 Mon 7/17/02 hr 21 Wed 7/18/02 hr 24 Thu 7/21/02 hr 1 Sun 7/22/02 hr 7 Mon 7/26/02 hr 1 Fri 7/27/02 hr 23 Sat 7/28/02 hr 8 Sun 7/29/02 hr 20 Mon 7/30/02 hr 2 Tue 7/31/02 hr 10 Wed 8/ 1/02 hr 7 Thu 8/ 2/02 hr 24 Fri 8/ 4/02 hr 16 Sun 8/10/02 hr 1 Sat 8/11/02 hr 20 Sun 8/13/02 hr 20 Tue 8/15/02 hr 20 Thu 8/22/02 hr 8 Thu 8/23/02 hr 22 Fri 9/ 8/02 hr 3 Sun 9/ 9/02 hr 3 Mon 9/10/02 hr 24 Tue390550004 6/ 4/02 hr 7 Tue 6/ 5/02 hr 15 Wed 6/ 9/02 hr 6 Sun 6/10/02 hr 7 Mon 6/11/02 hr 21 Tue 6/20/02 hr 1 Thu 6/21/02 hr 16 Fri 6/22/02 hr 21 Sat 6/23/02 hr 6 Sun 6/24/02 hr 6 Mon 6/25/02 hr 7 Tue 6/30/02 hr 17 Sun 7/ 1/02 hr 8 Mon 7/ 4/02 hr 24 Thu 7/ 8/02 hr 20 Mon 7/14/02 hr 20 Sun 7/17/02 hr 15 Wed 7/18/02 hr 18 Thu 7/22/02 hr 20 Mon 7/26/02 hr 15 Fri 7/27/02 hr 18 Sat 7/31/02 hr 19 Wed 8/ 1/02 hr 20 Thu 8/ 4/02 hr 16 Sun 8/11/02 hr 16 Sun 9/ 9/02 hr 1 Mon 9/10/02 hr 19 Tue170317002

	rrf	H2O2/HNO3

0.9217	13.720
0.9039	0.923
0.9262	7.512
0.9387	11.950
0.9048	21.328
0.8747	9.081
0.8896	3.426
0.8826	32.489
0.9122	11.004
0.9129	6.018
0.8817	6.704
0.9008	1.986
0.8562	5.823
0.8389	25.598
0.8511	7.446
0.8814	5.014
0.9172	7.177
0.8430	3.684
0.8830	3.188
0.9008	0.838
0.9013	9.917
0.9317	0.504
0.9111	0.838
0.8879	0.630
0.8677	0.652
0.8687	0.807
0.8872	0.974
0.8986	1.657
0.8826	0.750
0.8523	1.701
0.8829	18.799
0.9193	20.729
0.8806	0.737
0.9024	0.727
0.8713	0.511
0.8963	2.494
0.8495	1.003
0.8572	1.005
0.8574	0.812
0.9034	3.154
0.9423	2.391
0.8869	0.817
0.9086	0.737
0.8830	0.729
0.8729	1.357
0.9026	4.232

0.8748	24.957
0.8444	7.342
0.8727	29.897
0.8636	2.446
0.8684	7.325
0.8594	2.095
0.8433	4.439
0.8210	3.495
0.8319	3.759
0.8758	3.846
0.8898	5.624
0.8200	1.666
0.8457	9.753
0.8782	9.773
0.8663	1.416
0.8507	3.838
0.8972	4.616
0.8826	1.826
0.8493	10.900
0.8573	3.129
0.8424	12.625
0.8809	1.634
0.8608	2.084
0.8365	6.526
0.8353	1.678
0.8489	1.887
0.9025	1.941

Monitor vs. model comparisons at 572 locations

>>>>

					monitor	model
	matched	mod.-mon.
station	pairs	mean err.	RMS err.	mon.	mod.

Here are all the coarse-grid cells with at least one predicted 8-hr avg. greater than 0.1650

cell	highest 8-hr	begins	2nd highest 8-hr	begins
( 42, 76)	0.1746	7/ 4/02 hr 11 Thu	0.1742	7/ 4/02 hr 10 Thu
( 52, 79)	0.1666	6/24/02 hr 12 Mon	0.1644	6/24/02 hr 11 Mon
( 53, 80)	0.1857	7/29/02 hr 12 Mon	0.1817	7/ 3/02 hr 12 Wed
( 53, 81)	0.1857	7/29/02 hr 13 Mon	0.1839	7/29/02 hr 12 Mon
( 53, 82)	0.1669	7/29/02 hr 13 Mon	0.1642	7/30/02 hr 13 Tue
( 54, 82)	0.1720	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1703	7/29/02 hr 15 Mon
( 54, 83)	0.1658	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1643	7/29/02 hr 15 Mon
( 55, 83)	0.1719	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1711	7/29/02 hr 13 Mon
( 55, 84)	0.1683	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1663	7/29/02 hr 15 Mon
( 56, 84)	0.1665	7/29/02 hr 15 Mon	0.1659	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon

10 cells are affected.

Here are all the cells from the coarse grid with at least one predicted 8-hr avg. conc. of O3 greater than 0.16000
that are a local peak, or that are within 420.km of central Ohio and have an 8-hr avg. greater than 0.11500
and are a local peak.

cell	highest 8-hr	begins	2nd highest 8-hr	begins
( 42, 52)	0.1167	7/ 1/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1164	7/ 1/02 hr 13 Mon	(near Ohio)
( 42, 76)	0.1746	7/ 4/02 hr 11 Thu	0.1742	7/ 4/02 hr 10 Thu
( 43, 53)	0.1162	7/21/02 hr 11 Sun	0.1133	7/21/02 hr 13 Sun	(near Ohio)
( 44, 62)	0.1212	6/25/02 hr 12 Tue	0.1197	6/25/02 hr 13 Tue	(near Ohio)
( 46, 75)	0.1630	7/ 3/02 hr 11 Wed	0.1559	7/ 3/02 hr 12 Wed
( 52, 79)	0.1666	6/24/02 hr 12 Mon	0.1644	6/24/02 hr 11 Mon
( 53, 57)	0.1241	6/22/02 hr 13 Sat	0.1225	6/22/02 hr 12 Sat	(near Ohio)
( 53, 80)	0.1857	7/29/02 hr 12 Mon	0.1817	7/ 3/02 hr 12 Wed
( 54, 61)	0.1217	6/22/02 hr 13 Sat	0.1217	6/22/02 hr 12 Sat	(near Ohio)
( 54, 82)	0.1720	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1703	7/29/02 hr 15 Mon
( 55, 62)	0.1166	6/22/02 hr 14 Sat	0.1165	6/22/02 hr 13 Sat	(near Ohio)
( 55, 83)	0.1719	7/29/02 hr 14 Mon	0.1711	7/29/02 hr 13 Mon
( 60, 84)	0.1625	7/ 3/02 hr 13 Wed	0.1623	7/ 3/02 hr 12 Wed

13 cells are affected.

The highest coarse gridwide average concentration is 0.04972 for hour 1264( 5/23/02 hr 16 Thu)

The highest cell concentration is 0.21194 at ( 53, 80) for hour 2871( 7/29/02 hr 15 Mon)

The highest cell concentration within a 420.0 km radius of ( 1188.8, 83.1) (which corresponds to Columbus, Ohio) is 0.1385 at ( 53, 57) for hour 1984( 6/22/02 hr 16 Sat)

back-trajectory analysis declined.

"Magno conatu nugas"

Nothing convinces persons of a weak understanding so effectually as what they do not comprehend.

"Political Maxims from Cardinal de Retz"

				meshing	dummy
day	no.	(ibeg,jbeg)	(iend,jend)	factor	no.	(row,cols,layers)	iparnt	ilevel

ai(ver. 4/12/06 ) Reads CAMx concentration and wind-field files for both coarse and fine grids, and fiddles around with them

ai

Reads CAMx concentration and wind-field files for both coarse and fine grids, and fiddles around with them

4/12/06 12:30:28

Contents

Attainment (or not) Demonstration

Repeat of calculations with a new threshold for calculation of rrf

Attainment (or not) Demonstration

Monitor-to-Model Relative Reduction Factors

Culpability-related analysis of monitors of particular interest

Monitor vs. model comparisons at 572 locations

Here are all the coarse-grid cells with at least one predicted 8-hr avg. greater than 0.1650

Here are all the cells from the coarse grid with at least one predicted 8-hr avg. conc. of O3 greater than 0.16000 that are a local peak, or that are within 420.km of central Ohio and have an 8-hr avg. greater than 0.11500and are a local peak.

ai
(ver. 4/12/06 )

Reads CAMx concentration and wind-field files for both
coarse and fine grids, and fiddles around with them

Reads CAMx concentration and wind-field files for both
coarse and fine grids, and fiddles around with them

Here are all the cells from the coarse grid with at least one predicted 8-hr avg. conc. of O3 greater than 0.16000
that are a local peak, or that are within 420.km of central Ohio and have an 8-hr avg. greater than 0.11500
and are a local peak.